A Reiteration of Purpose- Isaiah 2:1
Isaiah 2:1
A secondary
superscription reintroduces us to the vision of Isaiah. These are words he saw
in a vision which came to him (cf. Lam. 2:9; Ez.7:26). Put another way, these
words are not just his own creation. The prophets were earlier called seers (1
Sam. 9:9) and this points us to one of the realities of prophecy.
As
prophecy is a vision from God, the prophets make known a present reality to the
people of God. The visions seen are not necessarily about the future but are
instead about a contingent future following a failure to change in the present.
The present is necessarily a part of the vision of the prophets. The vision is
necessary because the people’s spiritual blindness has become so much a part of
their lives that they can no longer see what they are doing. Prophets speak the truth as they imagine a new way of being (I love much of Walter Brueggemann's writing in The Prophetic Imagination).
Jesus
refers to this same spiritual blindness several times in his ministry (e.g.
Matt. 15:13-14, 23:16-19; 23:24; Luke 6:39-42). It is no accident that the
healing ministry of Jesus involves physically healing several persons who are dealing
with blindness (e.g. Matt. 20:30; Mark 8:22-26). As they are healed, the
prophetic ministry of Jesus is unleashed with power as the Pharisees and the
teachers of the Law are rebuked in their own spiritual blindness. This brings
us back to Isaiah. Jesus brought his ministry for all to the reality of him
breaking into the present. The prophets hoped for present spiritual change so
that there would be future physical change. Jesus brought a present physical
and spiritual change as he preached the restoration of all things in the
kingdom. This is a part of the Good News, and one of the things that we must
see in the prophets is their looking forward to Messiah. Messiah brought the message they had always
hoped for as they saw a glimpse of the reality of God.
The
claim to have special revelation from God was critical to Isaiah’s message. It meant that God had not abandoned His
people. God’s provided His wisdom to bring life to His people. By following the
guidance coming via the prophet, God’s people could enjoy the benefits of the
special relationship afforded to them.
There
may have been some elapsed time between the superscriptions of chapter 1 and 2,
and it is likely the prophet had multiple visions from the Lord. The placement here
may also point to a reaffirmation of one of the overarching themes of the book –
the redemption of all people (compare 66:18-21). In any cases, although the
prophet or later editors may have ordered the book thematically for purposes of
chronology or thematic focus, repetition should only enforce the authorship of
the book and not cause us to question it. One other possibility for this
reiteration is that the author intended to set it apart from either: 1. A common
source material with Micah 4 (or) 2. Micah 4 itself. The most likely
straightforward reading of the text is that the material was written by Isaiah,
even if there was a common hymn both authors drew from in writing their
manuscripts, and Isaiah is a compilation of continuity brought together by
either the prophet or faithful editors.
Final thoughts:
11. What
does spiritual blindness look like today?
22. What
does it mean to make the kingdom of heaven known in the world?
33. What
planks do I need to take out of my own I so that I can better share the kingdom
message (cf. Matt.7:3-5; Luke 6:42)?
44. Do
I look for the things of God at work in the world? Do I have a heart for the lost?
55. When
I write, do I remember to give credit where credit is due?
Comments
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comments. As soon as your comment has been screened and approved it will appear. Please remember that no hateful written speech, trolling, or advertising will be allowed.