Justice in the Kingdom Community: Isaiah 1:16-19
Isaiah 1:16-19
I.
Vs. 16
a. Wash
yourselves, cleanse yourselves (cf. Ps. 51)
i.
The worshipers cannot cleanse themselves of
sin, but they can make inward and outward changes that are pleasing to God (cf.
Jer. 32:19).
ii.
The same is true for us today, our actions
do not save us, but they can be more pleasing to God.
iii.
This is more than a rhetorical flourish on
the prophet or God’s part. As God’s people, we are required to submit ourselves
to God and do good works.
b. Remove
evil – doing good alone is not sufficient. Evil must also be removed.
c. Stop
doing evil – we must do good in such a way that there is no room in our lives
to continue doing evil.
d. How
do we know the difference between good and evil? The antagonist to faith would
say that our definitions of good and evil are arbitrary at best, subservient
and malignant at worst. How should the believer defend against this secular
position?
i.
What criteria would remove arbitrariness
from a discussion of ethics? Does the secular humanist have a better position
to defend against this claim? It hardly seems so, every position starts from a
position of some sort of faith, whether it is faith in the precepts developed
from evolutionary standards or from the Bible. If we are starting from a point
of suspicion and skepticism, the secularist has even more a reason to be called
arbitrary because evolution and social standards alone have no outside moral
reason to say what is right or wrong. For example, if the secular humanist claims
there is no God (god) and then states that all the precepts of the Bible were
merely invented by humans to control other humans and enforce their own moral
code, then there reason to reject them will come from personal or social bias
developed by contemporary society. But why should contemporary society dictate
any what is right just because of temporal hubris? To say that previous
societies were wrong just because they were not as evolved is to assume that
evolution itself is helpful and right. But why should this be the case without
outside intervention? What about appeals to reason? Reason, without God, must
necessarily be an evolutionary solipsism. For, even if reason and rationale
exist independently of the human mind, what reason would we have to believe we
could access them consistently without the prejudices of evolution betraying
our ability to access them?
ii.
On the other hand, biblical faith must accede
to the position that we are not sufficient to ground reason or ethics on our
own. For biblical faith, this is not solipsism though. The referent in faith is
to a higher being who is free of these same restraints, by being infinitely wise,
and who has access to reason and ethics during the process of creation. From
this divine access point, the created order gets to start with all things being
good (cf. Gen. 1). Skeptics cannot claim any such common starting ground without
borrowing from faith.
iii.
This leads us to say that knowing good and
evil must come from:
1. Careful
study of scripture.
2. Knowing
God through the individual leading of the Holy Spirit
3. The
worship of the local church through holy lives
a. Community
developed in the Holy Spirit looks different than any other community
b. The
inherent messiness of this type of community comes from the reordering of:
i.
Priorities – how time is spent
ii.
Values - what type of things and ideas are
important
iii.
Culture – people of faith use those things
of culture which are valuable and beautiful, while rejecting those things which
demean original creation’s goodness
iv.
We must be careful to avoid human
authoritarianism and cult-like behavior while also honoring God
II.
Vs. 17
a. Learn
to do what is good and seek justice – these seem to be written to those who
have authority in society. However, seeking justice is something almost all
people can do in their dealings with others and even how they spend money (cf.
Deut. 16:20; Ps. 89:14; Amos 5:15; Zech. 7:9).
b. Correct
the oppressor/help the oppressed – there is little distinction between
correcting those who are oppressing others and helping the oppressed person (cf.
Ps. 68:5; Jer. 22:3; James 1:27).
i.
We live in one the most criminalized and
penalized societies in the world. Does our penal system enact justice or is it
partial to those who have money? In what ways does it divide our society
unjustly? When business is such a large part of the penal system, how much justice
is done in our system?
ii.
What about children and family members affected
by our penal system? Are we looking out for these people?
iii.
What about people who have been affected
by unjust laws related to our banking our bankruptcy systems? Are we caring and
looking out for these people?
iv.
Do we try to correct unjust laws?
c. People
of faith must be advocates to the vulnerable. We must be for life in all its
forms, not just in the womb. If we are for life, we are for the children who do
not receive proper nutrition during the week. We are also for single parents who
struggle to raise their children.
III.
Vs. 18
a. God
argues His case against the people of Judah (cf. Is. 43:26)
i.
What would God bring in a case against us
today?
ii.
The end of Job and the letters to the
churches in Revelation come to mind as bookends
1. We
are not as infinitely wise as God
2. We
must seek God first to act justly
3. God’s
priorities are often not our priorities
b. Psalm
51 is again recalled, if not quoted as this juncture. As always, the point of discipline
is restoration.
c. It
is no accident that Jesus’ robes were scarlet (Matt. 27:28; also see Lev. 14:4
for an interesting passage)
i.
Our sins were carried by Jesus both
literally and figuratively for those who had eyes to see
ii.
The situation is no different today, and
we are reminded of this reality when we regularly take communion with others
IV.
Vs. 19
a. For
those who are willing and obedient, a promise of full life in the land is given
i.
For the descendants of Jacob, this was a
promise of the physical land of Israel.
ii.
For the church, we look forward to a
restoration of heaven and earth after the return of Christ.
iii.
Willing and obedient are parallel thoughts.
The one who is willing must also be obedient. True obedience is not blind, it
is willing to follow God.
b. For
the Christian, when we take and eat the body of Christ, we are taking and
eating the good things. This is metaphorical in relation to this verse, but it
is also true and important. As noted earlier, true Christian community becomes
a distinct thing in the world when done right. It also points us toward the
coming reality of kingdom through our current participation in the kingdom.
Final thoughts:
1. Am
an I advocate for the poor and oppressed, those who are vulnerable?
2. What
sins of commission (things I have done) do I need to confess and repent of in
my life?
3. What
sins of omission (things I have failed to do when I should have – e.g. helping
someone in need) do I need to confess and repent of in my life?
4. Are
my ethics grounded properly in kingdom ethics?
5. How
can I live in a way that honors God with my good works of righteousness?
6. When
I come to communion, is there someone in the community I need to make things
right with?
7. What
does a growing kingdom community look like in the church?
Comments
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comments. As soon as your comment has been screened and approved it will appear. Please remember that no hateful written speech, trolling, or advertising will be allowed.